In a world where celebrity influence can either make or break a brand, two starkly contrasting narratives are emerging from the intersecting realms of entertainment and commerce. On one side, we have Stephen Colbert, a late-night titan whose tenure at CBS is reportedly ending under a cloud of financial losses and political controversy. On the other, actress Sydney Sweeney has become an unlikely economic powerhouse, single-handedly boosting a major retailer’s stock value by a staggering amount with a simple denim campaign. This tale of two celebrities highlights a growing divide between traditional media models and the modern consumer, suggesting that a new kind of star power is driving market value.

Sydney Sweeney's jean advert criticised for 'sexualising' domestic abuse  awareness

The news of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert ending in May 2026 came as a shock to many, but financial reports have quickly illuminated the driving force behind the decision. According to multiple sources, Colbert’s show was a significant financial drain for CBS, operating at an estimated loss of between $40 million and $50 million a year. This figure, while disputed by some, has been cited by industry insiders as a key reason for the network’s move to pull the plug, with one report from a popular Reddit thread quoting journalist Matthew Belloni, who stated, “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is losing more than $40M a year.”

While the show enjoyed a period of ratings dominance during the Trump presidency, its financial performance has struggled to keep pace with production costs. The show’s annual production cost reportedly topped $100 million a year, a massive figure that traditional advertising revenue was no longer able to cover. According to an ad-tracking firm, the show’s ad revenue plummeted from $121.1 million in 2018 to $70.2 million last year, a sharp decline that highlights the broader challenges facing the late-night television genre. While Colbert’s salary, reportedly $15 million a year, contributed to the high costs, the financial losses were a systemic issue rooted in changing viewer habits and a pivot to a new, digital-first model.

The irony of the situation is not lost on many observers. Colbert, who built a reputation on “woke comedy” and relentless political satire, appears to have been a financial liability for his network. His show’s content, which was heavily focused on political commentary and criticism, resonated with a specific, engaged audience but may not have had the broad commercial appeal needed to justify its immense production costs in a fragmented media landscape. While his show may have been a critical darling and an Emmy nominee, the hard truth of the business world is that profits often outweigh prestige.

Meanwhile, in a completely different corner of the entertainment and retail world, Sydney Sweeney is proving that star power can still translate into massive financial gains. The actress, who has become a social media sensation, recently partnered with American Eagle for its new denim campaign. The ad, which featured the tagline, “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans genes,” became a viral hit, sparking a significant surge in consumer interest and, most importantly, a monumental jump in the company’s stock price.

Stephen Colbert Creates Some #FlakeNews - YouTube

Following the launch of the campaign, American Eagle’s stock soared by 10%, adding an estimated $200 million in market value. According to a report by the Hindustan Times, the stock rally saw the share price rise by an astounding 17.65% in a single day, taking the company’s market capitalization beyond $2 billion for the first time in months. This incredible economic impact highlights the immense power of a celebrity endorsement when it connects with a massive and engaged audience. Sweeney’s appeal is rooted in her blend of traditional Hollywood glamour and a modern, social media-savvy persona, a combination that has proven to be a goldmine for brands.

This stark contrast between Colbert and Sweeney tells a fascinating story about the current media and business environment. On one hand, there is a traditional media model that is struggling to adapt to a digital-first world. High-cost, politically charged content, once a hallmark of network television, is no longer the guaranteed cash cow it once was. On the other, we have a new, more direct and authentic form of celebrity influence that can generate immediate and substantial value for a brand. Sweeney’s success with American Eagle suggests that consumers are responding to authenticity and star power in a way that is less focused on politics and more on aspirational, feel-good messaging.

While the reasons for Colbert’s departure are complex, with many suspecting political undertones, the financial figures speak for themselves. The late-night comedy genre is in a state of flux, and the massive losses reported by CBS suggest that the current model is unsustainable. In contrast, American Eagle’s massive stock jump proves that there is still a powerful, untapped market for celebrity-driven campaigns that can cut through the noise and resonate with a wide audience. As the media landscape continues to evolve, the success of Sydney Sweeney may serve as a blueprint for how brands can thrive, while the story of Stephen Colbert may be seen as a cautionary tale of a once-dominant model in its final stages of decline.