NEW YORK, NY – The unexpected announcement from CBS this week, revealing the abrupt cancellation of its long-running flagship program, “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” has ignited a firestorm across the media landscape. While network executives attempted to frame the decision as a strategic pivot in response to “changing viewer habits” and an “evolving media landscape,” the rationale has been vehemently challenged by many, most notably by the outspoken television personality Tyrus, who has branded the move a catastrophic misstep that could jeopardize CBS’s very existence.

Is The Late Show with Stephen Colbert canceled?

For decades, “The Late Show” has been an indelible fixture of American late-night television. Under the stewardship of Stephen Colbert, it evolved into a cultural touchstone, celebrated for its incisive wit, high-profile celebrity interviews, and profound cultural commentary. The show was not merely a program; it was a reliable ratings powerhouse for CBS, frequently leading its time slot in total viewership. Indeed, recent Q2 2025 ratings showed The Late Show with Stephen Colbert maintaining its top spot among late-night programs in total viewers, averaging over 2.4 million across first-run episodes, and being the only show in its category to see a slight increase in viewership quarter-over-quarter. This strong performance makes the network’s decision to pull the plug even more perplexing and has fueled widespread skepticism about the official narrative.

 

The news, which broke on Thursday, July 17, 2025, sent immediate shockwaves through the entertainment industry and its vast audience. CBS’s official statement focused on the need to “innovate for the future,” a generalized explanation that many found to be hollow. Social media platforms immediately erupted with disbelief and disappointment, quickly giving rise to speculation about underlying issues, including purported financial struggles within the network, internal power dynamics, or even a desperate attempt to reposition CBS amidst intense competition from streaming services.

 

Enter Tyrus, the former professional wrestler turned incisive Fox News commentator, known for his unfiltered opinions and commanding presence. Within hours of the announcement, Tyrus leveraged his platforms to express his profound outrage. “This isn’t just a bad call—it’s a colossal error,” Tyrus declared during a live broadcast segment, his voice resonating with conviction. “CBS is playing with fire, and they don’t even realize how close they are to burning the whole house down. ‘The Late Show’ wasn’t just a program; it was a cultural touchstone. You don’t just throw that away because you’re scared of change or chasing some new trend.”

 

Tyrus’s impassioned defense of the show and his condemnation of CBS’s decision struck a chord with a broad segment of the viewing public who felt blindsided. Clips of his commentary rapidly went viral, shared across countless social media platforms, with hashtags such as #SaveTheLateShow and #CBSMistake quickly trending worldwide. His commentary fueled an already burgeoning public backlash that CBS has struggled to contain.

The explosive reaction from Tyrus, combined with the collective outcry from fans, has effectively put CBS executives on the defensive. As the public uproar mounted, industry insiders began to scrutinize the true motivations behind the controversial decision. Was it solely about shifting demographics and advertising revenue, which has indeed seen a general decline across the traditional television landscape? Or, as many have speculated, was it influenced by a recent, controversial settlement between CBS’s parent company, Paramount Global, and President Donald Trump, a figure often targeted by Colbert’s sharp political satire? Colbert himself, in a defiant monologue following the cancellation, alluded to the settlement and questioned the financial justification, given his show’s consistent ratings performance. Other reports suggest the decision also aligns with Paramount Global’s impending merger with Skydance Media, which requires regulatory approval.

Whatever the confluence of factors, one undeniable reality has emerged: CBS profoundly underestimated the scale of the backlash that would follow the cancellation of “The Late Show.” And Tyrus, with his characteristic bluntness, has positioned himself squarely at the center of this burgeoning controversy, fanning the flames with each new interview and social media post.

In a particularly heated exchange on a popular podcast, Tyrus elaborated on his dire predictions, arguing that the cancellation was far more than a simple programming adjustment; it was an existential gamble. “Look, networks make tough calls all the time,” Tyrus conceded, “But you don’t just axe your flagship show without a plan. What’s the replacement? Where’s the vision? All I see is panic. They’re gambling with their own survival, and if this backfires, CBS could find itself irrelevant within a few years. That’s not an exaggeration. The audience is already leaving, and now you’re giving them one less reason to stay.”

Tyrus’s stark warnings have resonated with several media analysts, who concur that while late-night television faces undeniable challenges in a fragmented digital landscape, it still represents a significant component of CBS’s brand identity and a consistent, albeit evolving, revenue stream. The sudden void left by “The Late Show” could indeed create an opportune vacuum for rival networks and burgeoning digital platforms to fill, further eroding CBS’s traditional viewership and market share.

In response to the mounting pressure, CBS issued a follow-up statement attempting to mollify the enraged public. “We understand the passion our viewers feel for ‘The Late Show,’” the statement read. “This was not an easy decision, but we believe it is necessary as we chart a new course for the network. We thank Stephen Colbert and the entire team for their extraordinary contributions.” However, this carefully worded corporate response did little to quell the widespread outrage. Many viewed it as evasive and lacking in the transparency the situation demanded. Tyrus, for his part, remained thoroughly unconvinced. “That’s corporate speak for ‘we have no idea what we’re doing,’” he quipped on his subsequent broadcast. “If CBS thinks this is going to blow over, they’re in for a rude awakening.”

As the dust begins to settle on one of the most contentious decisions in CBS’s recent history, the network’s future remains shrouded in uncertainty. Will CBS double down on its new, albeit opaque, direction, or will the sustained public outcry and industry criticism force a re-evaluation? Will Tyrus’s ominous predictions of obsolescence come to pass, leading to CBS losing its long-held footing in the competitive late-night landscape? Or will this dramatic episode be eventually relegated to just another bump in the road for a media giant grappling with the relentless forces of technological and cultural transformation?

One element is undeniably clear: Tyrus has successfully tapped into a deep reservoir of frustration and nostalgia among viewers who feel that the television industry, in its quest for innovation and adaptation, is increasingly losing touch with the programming and personalities that once defined its appeal. His warnings, though dramatic, underscore the precarious nature of an industry where fortunes can, and often do, change overnight.

 

For the immediate future, all eyes remain fixed on CBS as it endeavors to navigate the significant fallout from this controversial decision. And as Tyrus continues to lend his influential voice to the debate, the story of “The Late Show’s” demise and its potential implications for the future of late-night television is undoubtedly far from over. Stay tuned.